Dutch court orders Bill Gates to appear in vaccine injury case. [29/10/24]

A DUTCH court has ordered Bill Gates to answer seven plaintiffs who allege that his representatives deliberately misled them and induced them to have Covid-19 vaccine injections which injured them.

Other defendants in the case are Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, former Dutch Prime Minister and current Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte, and members of the Dutch COVID-19 Outbreak Management Team.

A hearing was held on September 18 in the District Court of Leeuwarden in Friesland. Gates, who did not appear before the court but was represented by a lawyer, stated that he believes that a Dutch judge is not competent to judge him because he is an American citizen.

Both parties gave a plea in court. One of the plaintiffs, who is very ill, was also given the opportunity to make a plea. She was no longer able to speak and was represented by her father. 

Several recordings (in Dutch) are available from the hearing on September 18:

• During the hearing, recordings were made by De Vrije Omroep.
• Before and after the hearing, Zebra Inspiratie provided live coverage of the events.
• In the evening Erica showed the Press Conference LIVE via her Facebook page.

On October 16 the judge announced that Gates was in the wrong. The Dutch Judge does have jurisdiction. The official notification with the ruling was published on the website of Stichting Recht op Recht.

Summary of the case

The claimants allege that representatives of Gates (Hofstra et al) as a group and individually acted unlawfully towards them by deliberately misleading them in an unlawful manner and thereby inducing them to undergo Covid-19 injections of which Hofstra et al knew, or at least should have known, that these injections were not safe and effective. Source: Judgment (English).

Basis of the claim

The court documents record this claim by the plaintiffs: ‘Hofstra et al have implemented the Covid 19: The Great Reset Project. This is a project aimed at the total reorganisation of societies in all countries that are members of the United Nations, as described by [World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus] Schwab in his book Covid-19: The Great Reset. In this reorganisation, all factors that determine human life are made the subject of forced change by the WEF and the UN. Characteristic of this political ideology is that this forced and planned change is presented as justified by pretending that the world is suffering from major crises that can only be solved by centralised, tough global intervention.

‘One of these so-called major crises concerns the Covid-19 pandemic. Hofstra et al individually and as a group acted unlawfully towards the claimants by misleading them, in the context of the implementation of the Covid 19: The Great Reset Project, into administering Covid-19 injections, of which Hofstra knew, or at least should have known, that these injections were not safe and effective. According to the claimants, the claimants suffered mental and physical injuries as a result of these injections.’ – Source: Judgment

The dispute

Mr Gates’s representatives dispute jurisdiction. Not the claim.

The court documents say: ‘The dispute in this incident revolves around the question of whether this court has jurisdiction to hear the claims of [name redacted] et al against Gates in the main proceedings. Gates lives in the United States. There is no treaty between the Netherlands and the United States that contains rules on jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters such as those at issue here. The question of whether the Dutch court has jurisdiction over Gates must therefore be answered on the basis of general international jurisdiction law, as laid down in, among other things, Articles 1 to 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure.’ – Source: Judgment

Read More – Dutch court orders Bill Gates to appear in vaccine injury case.