-
Category: PCR Tests
COVID 19 – Scamdemic – Part 1
Posted By: Iain Davis August 25, 2020 Among many similar globalist states, The UK State is a public-private partnership between government, financial institutions, multinational corporations, global think tanks, and well funded third sector organisations, such as so called non governmental organisations (NGO’s) and large international charities. Through a labyrinthine structure of direct funding, grant making and philanthropy, the UK…
All Articles
-
![Why didn’t researchers do a proper study to discover whether the COVID virus exists? [Article From 27/7/20]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-18.png)
Why didn’t researchers do a proper study to discover whether the COVID virus exists? [Article From 27/7/20]
Imagine this fantasy: “After the published results of a new comprehensive study, which rejected the theory that a new pandemic coronavirus exists, a thousand infectious disease experts claimed they never said there was a new virus. One of these veteran researchers stated, ‘Virus? I was misquoted. I said “tires.” I was talking about car problems.…
-
The real pandemic is an outbreak of PCR testing [Article From 17/12/20]
And you can do something about this I keep hammering on the test because it is the main piece of public fakery that holds this whole pandemic illusion in place. If it falls, the illusion disappears. In numerous past articles, I’ve shown the PCR test is useless and deceptive, from several angles. Recently, I wrote…
-
In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus…wrong [Article From 25/12/20]
(To join our email list, click here.) In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this: [1] “Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test.” The test referred…
-
![If there is no virus, what is the test testing for? [Article From 4/2/21]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-73.png)
If there is no virus, what is the test testing for? [Article From 4/2/21]
As my readers know, I’ve been demonstrating that no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 exists. Therefore, what is the PCR test testing for? There are two piles of information here. By assuming SARS-CoV-2 DOES exist, you discover multiple internal flaws in the PCR. I’ve explored all of them in detail. If you back out of that…
-
![PCR test revelations from official literature; they expose their own lies [Article From 23/2/21]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/image-2.png)
PCR test revelations from official literature; they expose their own lies [Article From 23/2/21]
Here is another article in my series exposing the COVID PCR testing fraud [1]. For purposes of discussion, I’m assuming the virus is real, and the case and death numbers are meaningful. Within that official world, the internal contradictions and lies are huge. QUICK OVERVIEW The lockdowns are based on high levels of COVID cases.…
-
Defeating ‘Covid’ Test Fraud: Memo to Lawyers and Clients [Article From 28/2/21]
As I’ve detailed in my current series of articles on the COVID PCR test fraud, the test is run in cycles. [1] Each cycle is a quantum leap of magnification of the swab sample taken from the patient. When the test is run at 35 cycles or higher, the result is meaningless. Millions of those…
-
In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus…wrong [Article From 14/9/21]
In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” [1] under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this: “Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical or autopsy specimen using a molecular amplification test.” The test referred to is the PCR. And…
-
![False positive results in real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2? [25/01/22]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-70.png)
False positive results in real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2? [25/01/22]
The following post was written to update a previous Short from 2020. Please see the past Short on this topic here. There are multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emergency use authorization (EUA) tests among clinical laboratories and a large amount of cross-assay variation between different assays. Moreover, these assays were rapidly developed, minimally…
-
![PCR Testing Saga: Were We Duped? [23/02/21]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-102.png)
PCR Testing Saga: Were We Duped? [23/02/21]
Were federal health officials and experts at WHO really unaware that the recommended high cycle count (CT) for PCR tests would produce an exorbitant number of false positives for COVID? by Dr. Joseph Mercola Story at-a-glance: For several months, experts have highlighted the true cause behind the COVID-19 pandemic, namely the incorrect use of PCR tests set at a ridiculously…
-
The failure of PCR mass testing [19/06/21]
PCR cycle threshold (11-37) and positive cell culture (black line, 100% to 0%). The colored bars indicate the number of positive cell cultures per ct per week after infection (1 to 3 weeks). (Jafaar/Raoult) A new German study confirms and explains the failure of PCR mass testing. In March 2020, SPR warned that PCR mass testing in…