-
Category: PCR Tests
COVID 19 – Scamdemic – Part 1
Posted By: Iain Davis August 25, 2020 Among many similar globalist states, The UK State is a public-private partnership between government, financial institutions, multinational corporations, global think tanks, and well funded third sector organisations, such as so called non governmental organisations (NGO’s) and large international charities. Through a labyrinthine structure of direct funding, grant making and philanthropy, the UK…
All Articles
-

21 Powerful Facts That Demolish the Official COVID-19 Narrative
1. The PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 was never intended to be used to detect viruses. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test who won a Nobel Prize for his efforts, is on record as stating that diagnosing viruses is an inappropriate use of the technology that can easily produce false positive results. 2. In…
-
![The Innova scandal Part 3: The US says ‘Throw the tests in the trash’ [Article From 14/6/21]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/17823079859245189643822122809127.jpg)
The Innova scandal Part 3: The US says ‘Throw the tests in the trash’ [Article From 14/6/21]
This is the third instalment of a now four-part investigation into the scandal of the British Government’s procurement of the flawed Innova Covid-19 lateral flow test now trashed in America by the FDA whose scathing critique of the test, the UK Government, with contracts with Innova to date totalling £3.2billion, has decided to discount. You can read…
-

Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose. So what do the MSM do? They ignore it
Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable. Earlier this month, Portuguese judges upheld a decision from a lower court that found the forced quarantine of…
–
-
![Pandemic would end tomorrow if they stopped using the PCR test [Article From 5/2/21]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-18.png)
Pandemic would end tomorrow if they stopped using the PCR test [Article From 5/2/21]
ry to imagine it is the year 2019 again. Just for a second. You’re in the pub, or on holiday in the sun, having a laugh with family or friends. One of your friends says to you, “By the end of next year it will be illegal to leave your home unless it is to…
-
![The COVID19 PCR Test: Facts, Oddities & other Discrepancies [Article From 19/02/21]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-121.png)
The COVID19 PCR Test: Facts, Oddities & other Discrepancies [Article From 19/02/21]
Are common human coronaviruses causing mild respiratory and self – limiting symptoms, being presented and reported under the guise of SARS CoV-2? This article relates to the validity of Australian PCR testing of the viral pathogen SARS CoV-2, resulting in a worldwide pandemic of symptoms or disease known as COVID-19. RT-PCR gene targets SARS CoV-2…
-
![The failure of PCR mass testing [Article From 19/6/21]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-18.png)
The failure of PCR mass testing [Article From 19/6/21]
PCR cycle threshold (11-37) and positive cell culture (black line, 100% to 0%). The colored bars indicate the number of positive cell cultures per ct per week after infection (1 to 3 weeks). (Jafaar/Raoult) A new German study confirms and explains the failure of PCR mass testing. In March 2020, SPR warned that PCR mass testing in…
-
![Why didn’t researchers do a proper study to discover whether the COVID virus exists? [Article From 27/7/20]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-18.png)
Why didn’t researchers do a proper study to discover whether the COVID virus exists? [Article From 27/7/20]
Imagine this fantasy: “After the published results of a new comprehensive study, which rejected the theory that a new pandemic coronavirus exists, a thousand infectious disease experts claimed they never said there was a new virus. One of these veteran researchers stated, ‘Virus? I was misquoted. I said “tires.” I was talking about car problems.…
-
![The real pandemic is an outbreak of PCR testing [Article From 17/12/20]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-18.png)
The real pandemic is an outbreak of PCR testing [Article From 17/12/20]
And you can do something about this I keep hammering on the test because it is the main piece of public fakery that holds this whole pandemic illusion in place. If it falls, the illusion disappears. In numerous past articles, I’ve shown the PCR test is useless and deceptive, from several angles. Recently, I wrote…
-
![In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus…wrong [Article From 25/12/20]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-18.png)
In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus…wrong [Article From 25/12/20]
(To join our email list, click here.) In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this: [1] “Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test.” The test referred…
-
![If there is no virus, what is the test testing for? [Article From 4/2/21]](https://covidcon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-73.png)
If there is no virus, what is the test testing for? [Article From 4/2/21]
As my readers know, I’ve been demonstrating that no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 exists. Therefore, what is the PCR test testing for? There are two piles of information here. By assuming SARS-CoV-2 DOES exist, you discover multiple internal flaws in the PCR. I’ve explored all of them in detail. If you back out of that…

