VACCINES FOR A VIRUS WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED? This is NOT science! [2020]

Is this a virus or an exosome?
The war between the followers of Pasteur & Bechamp may be the most important issue in the world today & yet it is barely understood by the general public.
Pasteur favoured Germ Theory & Bechamp advocated for Terrain Theory.

In spite of confessing that he had poisoned his victims to achieve his results, Pasteur’s theory was adopted by the Rockefeller Institute & their developing medical schools because it afforded them the opportunity to develop & profit from pharmaceuticals derived from the waste products of the oil & gas industries.
Naturopaths & hygienists favoured the Terrain Theory which recommended scrupulous cleanliness & good nutrition to defeat disease.
http://maronewellness.com/pasteur-vs-bechamp-an-alternative-view-of-infectious-disease/
Both systems worked to eradicate diseases

Dr Andy Kaufman created a video presentation which carefully explains the virus vs exosome debate here:

It is December of 2020, the end of the worst, most stressful year in my living memory.
The UK is rushing to be the first country in the world to provide vaccines for coronavirus to it citizens.
My first point ought to be obvious but does not seem to have been discussed very much on main stream media.

The vaccine manufacturers do not claim to be producing a vaccine against SARSCov2 & its subsequent disease, COVID19.
Instead all the studies & government papers refer to a huge raft of Coronavirus vaccines

There are thousands of coronaviruses & they mutute constantly, we are told by virologists, so how can a vaccine to combat them have been produced in such a short space of time?

Concerned about this slip from specifying the illness we are locked down, masked & hand-washing to prevent I set out to find out as much as I could about the vaccines which we are expected to accept.

First I looked at the Oxford University AstraZeneca version & came up with a very interesting video:

I had previously (23rd November) addressed Oxford University via Twitter, with a very important question as follows:

Big-P-Harma’s “virus genome” is a computer sequenced copy of a non-isolated, non-purified Wuhan sample “grown” in monkey kidney cells & anti-biotics which failed to meet Koch’s postulates.
How can science attenuate a virus that has NEVER been correctly identified or verified?

I supported this question with my previous investigation into the existence of #SARSCov2 here:
https://hive.blog/news/@francesleader/no-one-has-proved-that-covid19-exists-a-collection-of-the-evidence

Plus my doubts about the origin of the genomic sequence being used as the foundation for all vaccine development, supported by flaws found in the early Wuhan scientific study dated 20th February 2020:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092803

This was the study used to computer generate the original #SARSCov2 genome sequence.
Note that Vero E6 cells (referred to) are monkey kidney cells.
Quoting from the study:
“Virus isolation from the clinical specimens was performed with human airway epithelial cells and Vero E6 and Huh-7 cell lines” & in the conclusion: “Although our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates, our analyses provide evidence implicating 2019-nCoV in the Wuhan outbreak.”

I had concluded that the material named SARSCov2 had not been adequately isolated or purified before being identified as the cause of COVID19. Furthermore, it had never been injected into any living being & caused the disease to confirm that it was indeed the pathogen being sought.

Read More – VACCINES FOR A VIRUS WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED? This is NOT science!