Five recent papers show COVID vaccine harms outweigh any benefits [Article from 9/5/25]

Don’t worry. The FDA, CDC, and Congress are never going to apologize for their mistake. One of these papers has already been rejected by 6 journals without even reading the paper!

Executive summary

Here are five recent papers that everyone should know about and one of my favorite older papers I haven’t written about.

All show vaccine harms outweigh benefits.

I sound like a broken record, don’t I?

I’m here to document just how obvious this is to anyone who looks at the data.

Levi paper: Pfizer increases your ACM by > 36%

This study, on its own, can be used to show that the COVID vaccine killed people if you know the big trick.

Here’s the big trick: COVID vaccines don’t reduce non-COVID all cause mortality. If the NCACM of the vaccines are not the same, it’s certain that at least one vaccine is killing people.

Details on how Pfizer killed 470,000 Americans can be found here.

After I countered all the silly objections, even Grok was forced to admit that this paper should cause health authorities to revoke the Pfizer vaccine (at a minimum).

Maniche paper: Women who got the shot were 30-50% less likely to give birth

This study, Rates of Successful Conceptions According to COVID-19 Vaccination Status: Data from the Czech Republic, was done by researchers I know. They looked at the Czech data and the result is stunning:

The paper has been rejected by 6 journals so far. Check this out:

The reason for the rejection is that readers of the journal don’t want to read articles showing they got it wrong.

Meanwhile, the CDC will continue to recommend pregnant women get the shot.

Okoro paper: More vaccines, more death

The paper, “Paradoxical increase in global COVID-19 deaths with vaccination coverage: World Health Organization estimates (2020–2023)” shows a high correlation (.5 and highly statistically significant) between vaccination and death. The paper says this is a paradox because everyone knows the vaccines saved lives, right???? <sarcasm off>

Note the the text on the CFR correlation is wrong and the table is correct.

“Last dose per 100” refers to persons who had a complete primary vaccination as per specific vaccine dosage schedule. This value is then scaled per 100 persons as provided from our referenced data sources. Of note, most of the vaccines in use at the time required a two-dose schedule for primary vaccination to be complete.

Read More – Five recent papers show COVID vaccine harms outweigh any benefits [Article from 9/5/25]